<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LegalZoom Blog &#187; Dan Goldman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.legalzoom.com/author/dgoldman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com</link>
	<description>Legal news and small business tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 20:36:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In-N-Out vs.…Who Again?</title>
		<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/in-n-out-vs-%e2%80%a6who-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/in-n-out-vs-%e2%80%a6who-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-N-Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legalzoom.com/?p=3352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’ve ever had an In-N-Out Burger—or even if you haven’t—you likely know the chain quite well. They’ve been much-beloved in California for decades, and have, over the years, expanded into 5 states with hundreds of restaurants. The chain is iconic—from the simplicity of its menu to the throw-back décor and amazing service, no one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/in-n-out-vs-%e2%80%a6who-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idea Versus Expression: What is Protected by IP Laws (And Who Can You Trust to Tell You)?</title>
		<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com/intellectual-property/patent-trademark-copyright-what-is-protected/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.legalzoom.com/intellectual-property/patent-trademark-copyright-what-is-protected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legalzoom.com/?p=2684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The laws protecting intellectual property (“IP”) are some of the more-often misunderstood in the US—very often, people don’t know whether they have something that needs copyright, trademark or patent protection, or some combination of the three. And, equally often, they don’t know whether what they have is protectable at all. While each area of IP [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.legalzoom.com/intellectual-property/patent-trademark-copyright-what-is-protected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Numa Numa” Kid Becomes Public Enemy?</title>
		<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/numa-numa-kid-becomes-public-enemy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/numa-numa-kid-becomes-public-enemy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lip sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numa numa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legalzoom.com/?p=2676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember this guy? Well, his name is Gary Brolsma, and, depending on your opinion of his ear-worm lip-synching video, you may or may not be pleased to hear that he might end up on the Copyright Office’s “Most Wanted” list. That’s right: the United States Senate wants to change unauthorized “public performances” of copyrighted works [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/numa-numa-kid-becomes-public-enemy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What About Jobs? Or, Richard Dreyfuss Takes a Few Bites of Apple</title>
		<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/what-about-jobs-or-the-legal-consequences-of-richard-dreyfuss-performing-the-itunes-eula/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/what-about-jobs-or-the-legal-consequences-of-richard-dreyfuss-performing-the-itunes-eula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dreyfuss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software licensing agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legalzoom.com/?p=2668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One major objection (and, arguably, defense) to End User License Agreements (EULAs) is that they tend to be prolix legal boilerplate and not able to be comprehended by the common user. Frankly, even as an IP lawyer, my eyes glaze over and I’m left just clicking and agreeing so I can get on with listening, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/what-about-jobs-or-the-legal-consequences-of-richard-dreyfuss-performing-the-itunes-eula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://podcast-files.cnet.com/podcast/4EffectiveUntil.mp3" length="604417" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://podcast-files.cnet.com/podcast/3Damage.mp3" length="343596" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://podcast-files.cnet.com/podcast/2Responsibility.mp3" length="994798" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://podcast-files.cnet.com/podcast/1Agreement.mp3" length="587281" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain-Squatting Takes on New Meaning: ICANN Approves New Top-Level Domain Name</title>
		<link>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/domain-squatting-takes-on-new-meaning-icann-approves-new-top-level-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/domain-squatting-takes-on-new-meaning-icann-approves-new-top-level-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Goldman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.legalzoom.com/?p=2424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Domain names have provided a good deal of fodder for the courts over the past few years. One need look only to the last year’s case law to find numerous examples of companies complaining about others’ use of domain names that divert or confuse customers. Usually the controversy arises when someone purchases a domain name [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.legalzoom.com/legal-news/domain-squatting-takes-on-new-meaning-icann-approves-new-top-level-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

